Bizarre Oddities: Zionist Chuck Schumer Gets To Point The Finger At Saudi Arabia Instead Of Israel For 9/11

  • iPage Web Hosting for only $1.99/Month
  • Free Domain for Life!
  • The Original $3.15/mo. FatCow Plan - Unlimited Disk Space, Unlimited Transfer, Unlimited E-mails & Site building tools.
  • Host your website with MyDomain!
  • Chuck SchumerBizarre Oddities: Zionist Chuck Schumer Gets To Point The Finger At Saudi Arabia Instead Of Israel For 9/11

    By Jack Allen

    That makes sense, a Zionist is pointing the finger away from Zionist Israel. By the way, did Saudi Arabia attack the USS Liberty? As far as 9/11 is concerned, Israel and Mossad have always been linked to the crime. I am not sure what the confusion is but Zionists have to be apart of the crime and cover-up of 9/11, they are connected to all aspects of it.. The history of false flag attacks that Israel has done to the United States is well documented.

    West’s war against terrorism is Israel’s war, Chuck Schumer says
    West’s war against terrorism is Israel’s war, Chuck Schumer says

    Below Brother Nathanael Kapner who was raised Jewish points to Israel and Mossad involvement in 9/11

    LARRY SILVERSTEIN:  9/11’s INSIDE MAN By Brother Nathanael Kapner

    THE ZIONIST JEW LARRY SILVERSTEIN obtained a 99 year lease of the World Trade Center on July 24 2001 just seven weeks before the 9/11 attacks. 

    Silverstein obtained this lease from his Jewish synagogue buddy, Lewis M Eisenberg, (who was then the Chairman of the Port Authority of New York), even though Vornado Realtyoutbid Silverstein by $50m. Eisenberg aborted Vornado’s bid in favour of his Zionist buddy Silverstein. Eisenberg, who was a huge contributor to the Bush-Cheney campaign, is a member of the Republican Jewish Coalition and former partner of the Jewish bank, Goldman Sachs. Silverstein and Eisenberg both held senior leadership positions with the United Jewish Appeal, a billion dollar Zionist organization. At present, Silverstein is on the UJA’s Board Of Directors. The UJA raises millions of dollars for its client, the Zionist State of Israel. Silverstein is also co-founder of the Israel Export Development Company. Of particular note, the Wall Street Journal reported that Silverstein regularly had breakfast at the WTC’s Windows on the World every morning. Yet strangely enough, Silverstein had a doctor’s appointment the morning of the 9/11 attack… (How did you know not to be there dear Larry?)

    SCIENTISTS, ARCHITECTS, & ENGINEERS now affirm that the 9/11 destruction of the World Trade Center buildings was an inside job. The leading scientist of Scholars For 9/11 Truth, Dr Steven Jones, has proven that controlled demolition devices were placed within the WTC Twin Towers – and this is what brought the buildings down not the airplanes. Jones says that molten metal was found in the sub-basements of the buildings. The molten metal, Jones argues, was caused by a high-temperature Thermite reaction, used to demolish steel. Thermal hot spots throughout the sub basement levels were detected by satellite – confirming Jones’ findings. Jones also says that heated dust with particles of Thermite was discovered in the WTC area. But Silverstein arranged that three NY Jewish steel and scrap companies ship the metalwhich could have been used as evidence to China & India. Paul W. Mason, structural engineer of Melbourne Australia, affirms Dr Jones’ findings:  “The chances of the buildings collapsing symmetrically into their own footprint at freefall speed by any other means than by controlled demolition are so remote that there is no other plausible explanation”  Here.

    The Samson Option: The Biggest Mass Murderers In History Have A Huge Nuclear Arsenal, Just How Dangerous Is Israel?

    Israeli Terrorism Against America

    The Day Israel Attacked America

    Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).


    A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.


    Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.


    Israel’s Use of False Flags in Global Terrorism

    By Michael Collins Piper Those who believe that Israel is behind the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria—hiding behind a “false flag” designed to implicate the Syrian government—have very good reason to believe in such a scenario. In fact, as my book, Final Judgment, which documents the role of Israel’s Mossad in the assassination of John F. Kennedy, first pointed out at far back as 1994, the use of “false flags” by Israel’s Mossad to cover up its role in worldwide assassination conspiracies and other criminal activity had been utilized time and again: “Arabs,” “radical Muslims,” “the Mafia,” “right-wing extremists,” and even environmentalists, among others, have repeatedly taken the fall for crimes committed by the Mossad or carried out under its coordination. The use of “false flag” operations by Israel and its Mossad has been documented repeatedly since the Jewish State first came into being. What follows is an overview of some other notable instances in which Israel utilized “false flags” in its international criminal endeavors, Perhaps the best-known instance in which Israel used a “false flag” to cover its own trail was in the infamous Lavon Affair in which, in July of 1954, there was a series of bombings in Cairo and Alexandria, Egypt. Among the targets were the libraries of the United States Information Service in both cities. In fact, the bombings were an operation by Israeli Military Intelligence who hoped both Egyptian President Nasser and the outside world would believe the attacks were carried out by militant Egyptian Muslim fundamentalists angry at Nasser’s friendly relations with the U.S. and Britain. Israel’s ultimate purpose was to destabilize Nasser’s relationships with both the U.S. and Britain and compel the British to withdrawal from their bases on the Suez Canal (although, in fact, in the end, no British targets were bombed, the initial plan notwithstanding). According to Colonel Benjamin Gibli, Israel’s chief of military intelligence and the senior army officer responsible for sending the final signal to Cairo to initiate the bombings, he had been given his orders by Defense Minister Pinchas Lavon whose instructions were as follows: “[Our goal is] to break the West’s confidence in the existing [Egyptian] regime . . . The actions should cause arrests, demonstrations, and expressions of revenge. The Israeli origin should be totally covered while attention should be shifted to any other possible factor. The purpose is to prevent economic and military aid from the West to Egypt.” The operatives placing the bombs were Egyptian Jews working for Israeli intelligence. However, Egyptian security uncovered the plot and eleven people were taken into custody. In the end, two were executed. The others were sentenced to long prison terms. Ultimately Israel’s involvement in the affair became public and Israel was rocked in the wake of the scandal. Competing political elements in Israel used the scandal as a bludgeon against their opponents. But the truth about Israel’s use of a “false flag” had come to international attention and demonstrated how it was willing to needlessly endanger innocent lives as part of its strategy to expand its global influence. To the degree that it is recognized for what it was—a “false flag” attack by Israel—the Lavon Affair is an acknowledged event in history, that has been documented even in multiple “mainstream” sources. But the Lavon Affair was just one of many false flag operations by Israel, and over the years, in the pages of The Spotlight (forerunner of AMERICAN FREE PRESS) international correspondent Andrew St. George focused on a number of the more notorious incidents. Here are a few of them: • A shadowy “right wing” group known as “Direct Action” was accused of the attack on Goldenberg’s Deli in Paris on August 9, 1982. Six people died and 22 were injured. The leader of “Direct Action” was one Jean-Marc Rouillan who had been operating in the Mediterranean under the cover name of “Sebas” and who had been repeatedly linked to the Mossad. All references to Rouillan’s Mossad links were deleted from the official reports issued at the time. However, the Algerian national news service—which had ties to French intelligence—blamed the Mossad for Rouillan’s activities. Angry French intelligence officers were believed to have leaked this information to the Algerians. Several top French security officials quit in protest over this cover-up of Mossad complicity in Rouillan’s crimes. However, other Mossad false flag operations also took place on French soil. • On October 3, 1980, a synagogue on Copernicus Street was bombed in Paris. Four bystanders were killed. Nine were injured. A worldwide media frenzy followed the incident. Reports held that “right wing extremists” were responsible. Yet, all of the “right wing extremists” who were questioned were released. In the upper echelons of French intelligence, the finger of suspicion was pointed at the Mossad. • On April 6, 1979, the same Mossad terror unit suspected of the Copernicus carnage blew up the heavily guarded plant of CNIM industries in southeast France, where a consortium of French firms was building a nuclear reactor for Iraq. The Mossad salted the site of the bomb blast with “clues” followed up with anonymous phone calls to police suggesting the sabotage was the work of an environmentalist group. • On June 28, 1978, Israeli agents exploded a bomb under a small passenger car in the Rue Saint Anne, killing Mohammed Boudia, an organizer for the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Immediately afterward, Paris police received anonymous phone calls accusing Boudia of involvement in narcotics deals and attributing his murder to the Corsican Mafia. A thorough investigation subsequently established that Mossad special-action agents were responsible for the terrorist killing. • In October, 1976, the same Mossad unit kidnapped two West German students—Brigette Schulz and Thomas Reuter—in Paris. Planted “clues” and anonymous phone calls made it appear that a Bavarian “neo-Nazi” group had executed the abduction. In fact, French intelligence established that the two victims had been flown to Israel, drugged, tortured, coerced into a false “confession of complicity” in PLO activities, and then anonymously incarcerated in an Israeli prison. • In February 1977, a German-born, naturalized U.S. citizen named William Jahnke arrived in Paris for some secretive business meetings. He soon vanished. Paris police were anonymously informed Jahnke had been involved in a South Korean bribery affair and “eliminated” when the deal went sour. A special team from SDECE, the leading French intelligence agency, determined Jahnke had been “terminated” by the Mossad, which suspected him of selling secret information to the Libyans. The SDECE learned Jahnke had been “fingered” to the Mossad by his own former employer, the CIA. • One of Israel’s most outrageous “false flag” operations involved a wild propaganda story aimed at discrediting Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi—one of Israel’s favorite enemies. In the early months of the administration of President Ronald Reagan, the American media began heavily promoting a story that a “Libyan hit squad” was in the United States for the express purpose of assassinating Reagan. This inflamed public sentiment against Libya and there were repeated calls for blood. Suddenly, however, the “hit squad” stories vanished. In fact, it was ultimately discovered that the source of the story was one Manucher Ghorbanifar, a former Iranian SAVAK (secret police) agent with close ties to the Mossad. Even The Washington Post acknowledged that the CIA itself believed that Ghorbanifar was a liar who “had made up the hit-squad story in order to cause problems for one of Israel’s enemies.” The Los Angeles Times itself had already blown the whistle on Israel’s scare stories. “Israeli intelligence, not the Reagan administration,” reported the Times, “was a major source of some of the most dramatic published reports about a Libyan assassination team allegedly sent to kill President Reagan and other top U.S. officials . . . Israel, which informed sources said has ‘wanted an excuse to go in and bash Libya for a long time,’ may be trying to build American public support for a strike against [Qaddafi], these sources said.” In other words, Israel had promoted the former SAVAK agent to Washington as a reliable source. In fact, he was a Mossad disinformation operative waving a “false flag” to mislead America. This was yet another Israeli scheme to blame Libya for its own misdeeds, this time using one “false flag” (Iran’s SAVAK) to lay the blame on another “false flag” (Libya). • Israel’s Mossad was almost certainly responsible for the bombing of the La Belle disco in West Berlin on April 5, 1986 in which an American serviceman died. Claims were made that there was “irrefutable” evidence the Libyans were responsible and President Reagan responded with an attack on Libya. However, intelligence insiders believed the Mossad concocted the “evidence” to “prove” Libyan responsibility. In the end, West Berlin police director Manfred Ganschow cleared the Libyans, saying, “This is a highly political case. Some of the evidence cited in Washington may not be evidence at all, merely assumptions supplied for political reasons.” • On April 18, 1986, one Nezar Hindawi, a 32-year-old Jordanian was arrested in London after security guards found that one of the passengers boarding an Israeli plane bound for Jerusalem, Ann Murphy, 22, was carrying a square, flat sheet of plastic explosive in the double bottom of her carry-on bag. Miss Murphy told security men that the detonator (disguised as a calculator) had been given to her by her finance, Hindawi. He was charged with attempted sabotage and attempted murder. Word was leaked that Hindawi had confessed and claimed that he had been hired by General Mohammed Al-Khouli, the intelligence director of the Syrian air force. Also implicated were others including the Syrian Ambassador in London.  The French authorities warned the British Prime Minister there was more to the case—that is, Israeli involvement. This was later confirmed in reports by the Western press. • In 1970, King Hussein of Jordan was provided with incriminating intelligence that suggested the PLO was plotting to murder him and seize power in his nation. Infuriated, Hussein mobilized his forces for what has become known as the ‘Black September’ purge of the PLO. Thousands of Palestinians living in Jordan were rounded up, some of the leaders were tortured, and in the end, masses of refugees were driven from Jordan to Lebanon. New data, coming to light after the murder of two leading Mossad operatives in Cyprus suggested that the entire operation had been a Mossad covert action, led by one of its key operatives, Sylvia Roxburgh. She contrived an affair with King Hussein and served as the linchpin for a major Mossad coup designed to destabilize the Arabs. • In 1982, just when the PLO had abandoned the use of terrorism, the Mossad spread disinformation about “terror attacks” on Israeli settlements along its northern border to justify a full-scale military invasion of Lebanon. Years later, even former Foreign Minister Abba Eban, admitted the reports of “PLO terrorism” had been contrived by the Mossad. • It is also worth noting that the attempted assassination—in London—of Israel’s Ambassador to England, Shlomo Argov, was initially blamed upon the PLO and was cited by Israel as one excuse for its bloody 1982 incursion into Lebanon. In fact, the diplomat was one of Israel’s “doves” and inclined toward a friendly disposition of Israel’s conflict with the PLO and the least likely target of PLO wrath. What’s more, one of the suspects in the crime was found carrying a “hit list” which actually included the name of the head of the PLO office in London. Thus, it appears that the assassination attempt was carried out by the Mossad—under another “false flag”—for two purposes: (a) elimination of a “peacenik” considered friendly toward the Palestinians; and (b) pinning yet another crime on the PLO. These instances cited here are but a handful of Mossad-orchestrated “false flag” operations blamed on a wide variety of alleged “suspects.” Michael Collins Piper Michael Collins Piper is an author, journalist, lecturer and radio show host. He has spoken in Russia, Malaysia, Iran, Abu Dhabi, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

    ‘Saudis Did 9/11’ is a Zionist Ruse

    by  Just last month a US court ordered Iran to pay $10.5 billion in damages to the families of victims of the 9/11 attacks which it had nothing to do with, and now the US Congress is pushing a bill that would allow the government of Saudi Arabia to be sued in American courts for their alleged “role” in the attacks. The US mainstream media has been abuzz with headlines about Saudi Arabia’s alleged guilt. The New York Times ran a story claiming that the Saudis threatened to sell $750 billion in treasury securities and other assets in the US if the congress passed the 9/11 bill. The New York Post published a story headlined “How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11” which lays out the supposed smoking gun evidence that members of the Saudi regime and royal family bankrolled some of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi we are constantly reminded. CNN-Saudis-911 This barrage of stories is clearly designed to provoke public outrage against the government of Saudi Arabia. Not only do these stories infer that the Saudi regime sponsored 9/11, but that they are now attempting to strong-arm the US government into covering it up. The resulting picture painted in the public’s mind is that of domineering Arabs lording it over the hapless and innocent nation of America that was not only attacked by Arabs on 9/11 but is now being forced to succumb to the pressure of Arab financial might. Unsurprisingly, this kosher storyline of Arab duplicity and conspiracy is being volubly championed by the new neoconservative hero Paul Joseph Watson. Manifestly, this utterly farcical narrative serves the Zionist vested interests who actually dominate the US political system. The Zionists and their American lapdogs have ample motive to deceive the public about the true sponsors, executioners and beneficiaries of the 9/11 attacks by laying a false trail of guilt towards Riyadh, just as they had done in 2001 by baselessly linking the atrocity to both the Taliban and Saddam Hussein to justify their overthrow. They’ve even attempted at various junctures to connect 9/11 to Iran, Hezbollah and the Palestinians. As Mike Rivero put it, 9/11 has been wielded by the US and Israel as a “one size fits all excuse to invade” Arab and Muslim countries that the Zio-American imperialists want to control. The claims of Saudi involvement stem from 28 pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 that were classified and kept out of the final report. Former US Senator Bob Graham has been pushing for the release of these pages for years. He has been all over the media lately forwarding the narrative, as he has done in the past, that the Saudi state was the “prime mover” behind 9/11, which he says is borne out in the 28 pages. On his website, 9/11 expert Christopher Bollyn asked the prudent question, “So, why are the Zionists coming out now, demanding that these 28 pages be released, 13 years after they were classified?” Two hardline Zionist US Senators, Chuck Schumer and Ted Cruz, are backing the bill currently before congress which would open the Saudis up to scrutiny on the matter. World Net Daily reports that presidential candidate Ted Cruz’s national security advisor Clare Lopez – a former CIA agent and ‘war on terror’ aficionado – is a major pusher of this latest blitz to hook the Saudis in with 9/11, which she also ridiculously tries to link to both Iran and Hezbollah. Lopez is the head of research and analysis at the Center for Security Policy, a militant pro-Israel neocon think tank known for its outlandish claims about “creeping Shariah” and how the Muslim Brotherhood has allegedly infiltrated the highest levels of the White House. She even claims that President Obama is a secret agent of the Brotherhood and has “the same goals as Osama bin Laden” despite the fact that Obama ostensibly had bin Laden assassinated in 2011. This Zionist-Neocon disinformation frenzy can only have one main purpose: to mislead the public about who actually planned, carried out and benefited from 9/11. As I document in my book Grand Deceptions and various other articles, the only nation to substantially benefit from 9/11 was Israel, as Benajmin Netanyahu gleefully observed many times. And the only individuals arrested on 9/11 in connection with the attacks were Israeli nationals, some of whom were confirmed Mossad agents that were seen video taping and subsequently celebrating the attacks in a New Jersey parking lot. The ‘Saudis did it’ angle hinges on the discredited claim that 19 hijackers commandeered and crashed four planes into the Twin Towers, Pentagon and a field in Shanksville. Other than the fact that many of these “hijackers” turned up alive and well in the Middle East protesting their innocence, it is highly doubtful that those claimed to have been behind the controls of the 9/11 planes could have performed this incredible feat when they were known to be terrible pilots with limited experience on commercial planes. And what of the miraculous unvarnished passport discovered near the World Trade Centre adorning the name and picture of Saudi national Satam al-Suqami? Was this laughable impossibility the handiwork of the Saudi government conspirators in an inexplicable attempt to frame themselves? Somebody planted it there, and it obviously was not any agent of Saudi Arabia. Saudis-Passport Then there’s the magical suitcase of Mohammed Atta – the bar-hopping, hooker-dating, cocaine-addicted Mafioso wannabe – that was topped up with incriminating “evidence” such as a Koran, a Boeing 757 training video, a flight data recorder, and Atta’s “last will and testament” which amounted to the “Rosetta stone of the investigation.” It conveniently did not get loaded onto the plane, and was quickly picked up by the FBI who then bandied it around as their central proof of Al-Qaeda involvement. Other convenient “clues” like Arabic language flight training manuals were left in rental cars at various 9/11 airports. Surely the Saudis are not in the business of conducting a terrorist operation and then planting fake evidence that would point back to themselves. And that doesn’t even consider the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7, which could only have been accomplished by Israeli and American specialists and insiders who controlled the ownership and security of the World Trade Center. Only high-level US officials could have organized the stand-down at the Pentagon to prevent whatever hit that building from being shot down. Neither could the Saudis have managed to disable US air defenses and NORAD, nor could they have organized the terror drills that mimicked the attacks. If there were no actual Arab hijackers on 9/11 and the whole thing is a frame up and farce, then the Saudis can’t be considered responsible for financing a terrorist operation that was conducted by others. Whether they were cognizant of it or not, the Saudis financed nothing more than a group of patsies who were selected as fall guys for a highly sophisticated false flag operation organized at the highest levels of US and Israeli intelligence. If there was any blackmail or unseen coercion involved, the Saudis were on the receiving end of it, not the other way around. The empire doesn’t take orders from low-level sheiks in Arabia. The Saudi rulers – as corrupt, autocratic and reprehensible as they are – are little more than slavish middle-managers of the American-Zionist Empire, a far cry from the domineering Caesarian overlords that the deceptive mainstream media and some Zionist apologists in the alternative media want to make them out to be. Middle-managers cannot organize the biggest conspiracy of the 21st century, hoodwinking the world’s foremost superpower and somehow managing to get away with it. Whatever is in those 28 pages, it should be considered nothing more than a red herring artifice to steal our attention away from the real captains of terror in Washington and Tel Aviv. Read More

    Amazon Apple Music Spotify iTunes Napster
    Deezer iHeart Radio Google Play - Youtube Tidal